Searchlight + ThermalSight ToggleLamp WIRED (#61) -- and a swapped table attribution ROOT-CAUSED, retracting a false "1995 latent bug"
Both classes' Receiver::MessageHandlerSet were default-constructed blackholes (input-path audit systemic cause #1): entryCount 0, no parent chain, Find() returns NullHandler for every id, Receive drops silently. The new unhandled- message trace printed it on the first press: [btntest] PRESS 0x14 at poll 400 [msg] UNHANDLED: Searchlight has no handler for message id 3 Each class now has a GetMessageHandlers() function-local static chained to PowerWatcher's (which name-resolves through HeatWatcher/MechSubsystem to Receiver's empty ROOT set, so id 3 does NOT collide with HeatSink's ToggleCooling), plus a correctly-typed forwarder -- Receiver::Handler is void(const Message*) while the decomp shape is Logical(Message&), so a cast would be UB that merely happens to work on x86 __thiscall. DefaultData re-pointed off the dead empty sets. MessageArg now reads the NAMED ReceiverDataMessageOf<int>::dataContents with a static_assert locking it to the binary's message+0xC (was a raw offset read -- databinding rule). ROOT CAUSE of a long-standing misattribution: @004b860c is **ThermalSight's** ToggleLamp (table @0x51120C), NOT Searchlight's. The two TUs emit parallel shared-data blocks with identical stride (msg entry, +0x5C attrs, +0x84 Performance triple); what pins each entry to its TU is that "ToggleLamp" is NOT pooled across them -- two copies exist, each emitted immediately before its own class-name string ("Searchlight"@0x51144B, "ThermalSight"@0x511475). [T1: reference/decomp/section_dump.txt:69661-69711] Searchlight's own handler is @004b838c, which sits in a Ghidra EXPORT GAP (#60). RECOVERED by raw disassembly of content/BTL4OPT.EXE (scratchpad/dis838c.py, the EjectAmmo technique) -- and it corrected two things I had inferred wrong: * NO ControlsAllowLights/+0x25C novice gate. Searchlight tests the press alone; that lock is ThermalSight-only. A NOVICE pilot CAN work the lamp. * `or word ptr [this+0x18],1` sits AT the jle target -> the graphics-dirty bit (updateModel == ForceUpdate(), per #59) is raised UNCONDITIONALLY. Consequence: the "ORIGINAL 1995 LATENT BUG -- the searchlight can never light" claim is RETRACTED. It compared Searchlight's Performance (@004b841c, reads requestedOn@0x1E0) against ThermalSight's toggle (0x1DC) -- two different classes -- and so invented a missing 0x1DC->0x1E0 bridge. Every sibling toggles the field its own Performance reads. The searchlight DID light in the arcade, the searchlight->fog swap was NOT inert there, and building PullFogRenderable is FAITHFUL rather than a designer-intent deviation (the 2026-07-13 "left as-is" decision is void; the sim needs no repair). Verified live, real click seam (BT_BTNTEST): 0x14 -> [light] requested ON -> reported lightState 0 -> 1 (lamp lights) 0x12 -> [light] thermal sight requested ON -> thermalActive 0 -> 1 UNHANDLED lines for both classes gone; 40 LNK2019 unchanged (the pre-existing CreateStreamedSubsystem + Entity__SharedData::DefaultData families only). Swept the misattribution out of searchlight.cpp/.hpp, thermalsight.cpp/.hpp, hud.cpp:282 (it had claimed @00511180/@004b838c as HUD's), btplayer.cpp's +0x25C consumer list, context/{decomp-reference,subsystems,rendering,open-questions, pod-hardware,experience-levels}.md, docs/{GLASS_COCKPIT,INPUT_PATH_AUDIT}.md. checkctx.py CLEAN. Still open (documented, not fixed): ThermalSight has no visible IR effect (ToggleGlobalThermalVision is a marked no-op, pvision unported, IsLocallyViewed returns False); ThermalSight publishes "LightState"->0x1D8 where the binary has "LightOn"->0x1D8 and "LightState"->0x1E0; Searchlight's commandedOn@0x1DC has no identified role and measured 21 live, hinting our SubsystemResource +0x28 differs from the binary's. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
62513b2f8a
commit
f3bdb3b85a
@@ -278,9 +278,16 @@ void
|
||||
// HandleMessage -- @004b7780 (slot 9)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// BEST-EFFORT: the vtable installs a HUD-specific HandleMessage at @004b7780,
|
||||
// but no body was captured in the recovered shards. A handler table
|
||||
// @00511180 binds the message "ToggleLamp" to FUN_004b838c. Chains to the
|
||||
// PowerWatcher handler otherwise.
|
||||
// but no body was captured in the recovered shards. Chains to the PowerWatcher
|
||||
// handler otherwise.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ATTRIBUTION CORRECTION (#61, 2026-07-25): this comment used to claim "a handler
|
||||
// table @00511180 binds the message ToggleLamp to FUN_004b838c" as if it were
|
||||
// HUD's. It is NOT -- @0051117C is **Searchlight's** message entry
|
||||
// {3, "ToggleLamp" @00511440, @004b838c}; @00511180 is merely its name+handler
|
||||
// pair (the entry base is 4 bytes lower). HUD's own data ends with its
|
||||
// Performance triple at @00511170 (@004b7830, HudSimulation). See
|
||||
// searchlight.cpp and context/decomp-reference.md for the table evidence.
|
||||
//
|
||||
Logical
|
||||
HUD::HandleMessage(int message)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user