CONFIRMED FIXED and closed: #95 (missile salvo damage), #97 (leak gauge 3 levels),
#98 (loop-6 lamp), #99 (leak alarm audible).
#95 deserves a note: a tester reported "LRMs still doing 3.3 damage", but that is
the PER-MISSILE figure. 382 impacts across three 693 logs show the cluster being
delivered correctly -- LRM20 3.25 x burst 5..20 (total up to 65), LRM15 3.33 x
3..15, LRM10 3.50 x 2..10 -- and those burst ranges match the binary's
Random(n)+n/4 roll exactly.
#32 REOPENED. The pooling change removed the alloc/free churn (the ~10% frame
time is real) but every 693 field log still shows
ACQUIRE FAILED (requested=4 live=240 pooled=240 free=0 ...)
19,182 fails (Sauron) / 15,333 (Rajel) / 6,818 (Ronin), high-water 225 of 240,
starting ~1% into every session. `free=0` is the diagnosis: sources are never
returned. This is precisely the risk flagged when the fix landed -- retention,
not pool size. Players called audio "fine" the same night; the log disagrees.
#84 still present, but the surviving explosion is a DIFFERENT mechanism from the
bundled one that was fixed: "where the mech was when I fired" is the stale
fire-time aim point already recorded as an open in rendering.md, i.e. an MP
visual, not the message-manager path. Needs a two-node bench logging the
OBSERVER -- the earlier two-node run verified damage delivery but never the visual.
New: #108 ghost mech (peer never sees the death; shots still register, so it is a
visual/replication desync, the inverse of #94), #109 panic/eject, #110 arm
parent/child linkage (gun pod survives its mount -- three chassis, both arms;
parentArtifactZone exists but only drives LOD), #111 death warp bubble shown to
peers, #112 AFC shotgun spread (may be authentic Ultra-AFC burst), #113 LRM burn
duration, #114 missile smoke as a smoke screen, #115 hot box, #116 Standard-vs-
Expert heat gating, #117 per-chassis cockpit bounce.
⚠ A MEMBER OF THE ORIGINAL TEAM IS NOW TESTING -- "Ronin" (log user torak). He
worked on the 1995 game and has played the pods recently. Treat his pod
comparisons as primary evidence above reconstruction inference. First two
contributions recorded in the KB: per-chassis cockpit bounce was deliberate, and
NARC likely shipped as data without an implementation.
⚠ Conn Man ran the OLD build (.674) for all seven of his sessions, so his reports
are not evidence about 693. His arm-linkage audit is still valuable -- nothing in
693 touched that path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
