Two-agent decomp hunt on the QA report ('AFCs jam on 3rd shot if coolant priority
not boosted'). Conclusion: the whole coolant->jam chain is reconstructed end-to-end
and FAITHFUL -- the weapon's constant coolantFlowScale=1.0 is authentic (only
condensers' 0x15C is written from the valve, via RecomputeCondenserValves over the
condenser chain mech+0x7cc). Authentic mechanism is second-order-in-equation but
first-order-in-outcome: weapon -> its condenser -> bank; boosting a condenser's valve
share (~5x conductance swing) keeps its weapon below degradationTemp -> no jam.
Distinguished the sticky probabilistic jam (degrad 1000, JammedState 5) from the
self-clearing overheat lockout (failure 2000, weaponAlarm 7). Empirically the port is
directionally correct (~4th-shot probabilistic) but not the QA's deterministic 3rd
shot -- a calibration/scenario question pending QA clarification, NOT a stubbed path.
Do not tune the heat economy to force it without ground-truth.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
