MECH_DAMAGE_BIAS(m) returned 0.0f under a comment reading "bring-up: factor =
0*bias+1 = 1", which invites a future session to wire it up. Auditing
Mech::Reset settled what it actually is, and 0.0f turns out to be EXACT:
* mech+0x354 has exactly ONE writer in the image -- Mech::Reset (@0049fb74,
part_012.c:14340). Nothing touches it during play.
* Reset computes mean(zone + 0x158) across every damage zone, AFTER the zone
heal has already zeroed those cells. So it is ~0 the moment it is written,
stays ~0 for the mech's whole life, and is recomputed as ~0 next respawn.
* It has exactly ONE reader -- CalcInflictedScore (@004c052c,
part_013.c:19055) -- as `avg * role.damageBias + 1.0`.
So the factor is 1.0 for the entire game and the stand-in reproduces the
binary exactly. 0x358 and 0x35c are the same computation over subsystem zones
and have NO reader at all.
This also raises confidence in the night-13 scoring work: the 505.88 kill award
was not right DESPITE a missing term -- the term genuinely is 1.0. Wiring
0x354 to live accumulated damage would silently inflate every inflicted and
kill award, and both chart-verified numbers (+1 a damage point, +500 a kill)
assume 1.0.
Comment rewritten at the macro; combat-damage.md carries the same finding [T1].
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01NCJQkvq6G2JNrpVbA75tVZ
