Chasing the un-decompiled targeting pick (the residual of #73). The hunt for
"who writes mech+0x37c/0x388/0x38c" kept coming back empty for a structural
reason now understood: those three fields are the tail of an embedded ENGINE
Reticle struct at mech+0x36c (RETICLE.h lays out position/state/pickPointingOn/
rayIntersection/targetEntity/targetDamageZone/elementMask, landing exactly on
0x37c/0x388/0x38c). Writers carry &mech->reticle and use small reticle-relative
offsets, invisible to any mech-relative displacement scan.
T0 corroboration, ENTITY3.h:131: "For BattleTech, damage zones are only valid
via reticle based weapons."
Ruled out as the writer: the engine Reticle itself (passive container -- ctor
and resource parse only); HudSimulation @0x4b7830 (holds &owner->reticle in esi
for its whole body but only READS the pick -- range caret, designator
transform -- and slews reticlePosition via the @0x4b7ed4 ease); the 0x482xxx
sites (mission-table target bookkeeping, address-of computations); the gyro
coefficient reads at 0x4b2c24/5c/6e (that class's own +0x370..0x38c table).
Still dark, with the candidates mapped: the un-exported 0x4a1674-0x4a2d48
stretch (reticle-touching at 0x4a16a5 in the Make-time init, 0x4a1f93, and a
state+pickPointing+base trio at 0x4a294a-61 near entry 0x4a2971), the two
unidentified Mech vtable overrides +0x18/@0x4a122c and +0x1c/@0x4a0c2c (both
big switch functions), and a few lone sites. One of these computes the
authentic pick; recovering it answers whether the pod tested the aim ray
against the mech's cylinder (as the damage table's geometry suggests) or a box
like the port's stand-in.
Recorded in combat-damage.md \xc2\xa7Targeting so the next session starts from the map
instead of the empty scans.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
