gauge-complete P4a: heat-leaf data fixes (radar heat-degradation authentic)
The gauge-complete-decode workflow found the "deep heat-leaf byte-exact re-base" is STALE -- the leaf layout already shipped byte-exact (alarm-unification/P7), and the real work is a small misidentified-field data fix (highest value, lowest risk): - Sensor radarPercent read the INHERITED heatEnergy (~1.3e7) -> hugely negative -> needed a bring-up guard forcing it to 1.0. The binary (@004b1c4c:1829) reads *(this[0x38]+0x158) = the subsystem's OWN DamageZone::damageLevel [0,1] (0 intact .. 1 destroyed). Fixed: radarPercent = RadarBaseline - GetSubsystemDamageLevel(); guard DELETED (damageLevel is engine-clamped). So the radar authentically degrades with sensor structural damage (RadarBaseline-damage, x0.5 on DegradationHeat, 0 on Failure). - New databinding-SAFE accessor MechSubsystem::GetSubsystemDamageLevel()/Set... reads the ENGINE DamageZone::damageLevel NAMED member (NOT the ReconDamageZone proxy, whose offset-0 structureLevel aliases the vtable ptr as a float = garbage). - HeatSink::HandleMessage msg==1: same misidentification -> SetSubsystemDamageLevel(0.5) (was linkedSinks->heatEnergy=0.5, wrong object+field). - MyomerCluster seek lamp: subsys+0x800 (OOB for 0x358 Myomers) -> currentSeekVoltageIndex @0x320 (the Emitter+0x3f0 analog; INFERRED -- ctor not in the assert-anchored export). - numericSpeed (~225 vs 61.5): verified NOT A BUG (NumericDisplaySpeed applies x3.6; the feed is correct u/s) -- closed, no code. No layout change (already byte-exact); pure data-read retargets. Verified DBASE+dev gauges: no crash, combat un-regressed (TARGET DESTROYED). (radarPercent degrade is only OBSERVABLE once per-subsystem damage routes to each engine DamageZone -- a separate task; today the sensor is undamaged so radarPercent = full 1.0, which is correct.) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
13f9c1f274
commit
12c4254aae
@@ -274,18 +274,15 @@ void
|
||||
|
||||
PoweredSubsystem::PoweredSubsystemSimulation(time_slice); // FUN_004b0bd0
|
||||
|
||||
// this[0x38] is the resolved thermal master sink; +0x158 == heatEnergy.
|
||||
radarPercent = RadarBaseline - HeatMasterEnergy();
|
||||
|
||||
// ⚠ BRING-UP GUARD (heat-leaf branch not byte-exact): the inherited heatEnergy
|
||||
// reads un-normalized/garbage here (~3850) so radarPercent goes hugely negative
|
||||
// and the radar reports non-operational. radarPercent is authentically a [0,1]
|
||||
// capability ratio, so when the heat term is out of range treat it as no penalty
|
||||
// (full radar). A real overheat penalty needs the heat-energy normalization
|
||||
// (deferred with the heat-leaf re-base). Exposed once the map gauge began
|
||||
// reading Avionics/RadarPercent; inert before.
|
||||
if (HeatMasterEnergy() < 0.0f || HeatMasterEnergy() > RadarBaseline)
|
||||
radarPercent = RadarBaseline;
|
||||
// @004b1c4c:1829 radarPercent = RadarBaseline - *(this[0x38]+0x158)
|
||||
// this[0x38] == the inherited MechSubsystem::damageZone (this+0xE0, an ENGINE
|
||||
// DamageZone); +0x158 == DamageZone::damageLevel = this Sensor's OWN structural
|
||||
// damage [0,1] (0 intact .. 1 destroyed, engine-clamped by DAMAGE.cpp:380). So
|
||||
// radarPercent is a natural [0,1] capability ratio -- NO guard/normalization
|
||||
// needed. (The prior read used the INHERITED heatEnergy ~1.3e7 -- a misidentified
|
||||
// field -- which drove radarPercent hugely negative and needed the bring-up guard,
|
||||
// now DELETED. Same anchor UpdateCoolant/heat.cpp:769 reads as zoneDamage.)
|
||||
radarPercent = RadarBaseline - GetSubsystemDamageLevel();
|
||||
|
||||
if (HeatModelOff()) // this[0x10] == 1
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user